1. Kotopouleas A.G. Thermal comfort conditions in airport terminal buildings : a thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). Kent School of Architecture. 2015. 261 p.

2. Kirk P.J. Passenger experience at airports: an activity – centered approach : a thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Queensland University of Technology. 2013. 211 p.

3. Scholvinck J. The Travel Stress Curve. Market Square Consulting. Amsterdam, 2000.

4. Thomas D. Retail and leisure developments at London Gatwick. Commercial airport. 1997. P. 38-41.

5. Griffiths I. Thermal Comfort Studies in Buildings with Passive Solar Features. Report ENS-090-UK. Surrey: University of Surrey, Department of psychology, 1990.

6. Airport Energy Efficiency and Cost Reduction : A Synthesis of Airport Practice. Transportation Research Board. Washington, 2010. 84 p.

7. Manchester Airport Master Plan to 2030. Manchester, 2007. 88 p.

8. Reddy S.J.P. Airport Energy Efficiency and Management. ACI Asia Pacific. 2014. 15 p.

9. Auliciems À., Szokolay S.V. Thermal comfort. 2007. 68 p. URL : http://me.emu.edu.tr/hacisevki/ MENG443% 20PPT1B.pdf

10. Hensen J.L.M. Literature review on thermal comfort in transient conditions. Building and Environment. 1990. ¹25 (4). Ð. 309-316. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(90)90004-B

11. Òèìîôååâà Å.È., Ôåäîðîâè÷ Ã.Â. Ýêîëîãè÷åñêèé ìîíèòîðèíã ïàðàìåòðîâ ìèêðîêëèìàòà. Ì., 2005. 194 ñ.

12. Ìåëèêîâ À. Òåïëîâîé ìèêðîêëèìàò ïîìåùåíèÿ. Îöåíêà è ïðîåêòèðîâàíèå. ÀÂÎÊ. 1999. ¹4. Ñ. 16-22.

13. Åðãîíîì³êà òåïëîâîãî ñåðåäîâèùà. Àíàë³òè÷íå âèçíà÷åííÿ òà ³íòåðïðåòàö³ÿ òåïëîâîãî êîìôîðòó íà îñíîâ³ ðîçðàõóíê³â ïîêàçíèê³â PMV ³ PPD ³ êðèòåð³¿â ëîêàëüíîãî òåïëîâîãî êîìôîðòó (EN ISO 7730:2005, IDT) : ÄÑÒÓ Á EN ISO 7730:2011. ×èííèé â³ä 2013-01-01. Êè¿â : ̳íðåã³îí Óêðà¿íè, 2012. 60 ñ.

14. Àåðîâîêçàëè öèâ³ëüíî¿ àâ³àö³¿. Äåðæàâí³ ñàí³òàðí³ ïðàâèëà ³ íîðìè, ã³ã³ºí³÷í³ íîðìàòèâè : ÄÑàíÏ³Í 7.7.3-014-99 / ÌÎÇ Óêðà¿íè. Êè¿â, 1999. 13 ñ.

15. Äåðæàâí³ áóä³âåëüí³ íîðìè. Îïàëåííÿ, âåíòèëÿö³ÿ òà êîíäèö³îíóâàííÿ : ÄÁÍ Â.2.5.-67:2013. ×èííèé â³ä 2013-09-01. Êè¿â : Ì-âî ðåã³îíàëüíîãî ðîçâèòêó, áóä³âíèöòâà òà æèòëîâî-êîìóíàëüíîãî ãîñïîäàðñòâà Óêðà¿íè, 2013. 167 ñ.

16. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occurancy : ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010. 2010. 41 p.

17. Zhang H., Huizenga C., Arens E., Yu T. Modeling thermal comfort in stratified environments. The 10-th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate. China, 2005. P. 133-137.

18. Olesen B.W., Scholer M., Fanger P.O Discomfort caused by vertical air temperature differences. Indoor Climate. 1979. P. 561-579.

19. Ñòåáë³é Í.Ì. ó㳺í³÷í³ êðèòå𳿠îö³íêè âèêîðèñòàííÿ ñïë³ò-ñèñòåì â æèòëîâèõ áóäèíêàõ. ó㳺íà íàñåëåíèõ ì³ñöü : çá. íàóê. ïðàöü. Ê., 2015. Âèï. 66. Ñ. 9-19.

20. Toftum J., Zhou G., Melikov A. Effect of airflow direction on human perception of draught. Proceedings of CLIMA 2000. Brussels, 1997. 366 ð.

21. De Dear R., Brager G.S. Developing an Adaptive Model of Thermal Comfort and Preference. ASHRAE Transactions. 1998. Vol. 104 (1). P. 145-167.

22. Morgan C., De Dear R. Weather, clothing and thermal adaptation to indoor climate. Climate Research. 2003. Vol. 24. P. 267-284. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3354/cr024267

23. Laurentin C., Berrutto V., Fontoynont M. Effect of thermal conditions and light source type on visual comfort appraisal. Lighting Research and Technology. 2003. Vol. 32. P. 223-233. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/096032710003200406

24. Galasiu A.D., Veitch J.A. Occupants preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy and Buildings. 2006. Vol. 38. P. 728-742. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001

25. Persily A.K., Dols W.S. The relation of CO2 concentra¬tion to office building ventilation. Air Change Rate and Airtightness in Buildings. Sherman M.H., ed. 1990. P. 77-92. URL : http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/SOURCE_PAGES/STP1067.htm

26. Persily A.K. Evaluating building indoor air quality and ventilation with indoor carbon dioxide. USA, Ashrae Transactions : Proceedings of the Ashrae Summer Meeting (Boston, 29 June - 2 July, 1997). 1997. Vol. 103, Part 2 [preprint].

27. Ñèñòåìû àäàïòèâíîé âåíòèëÿöèè: ïåðñïåêòèâíûå íàïðàâëåíèÿ ðàçâèòèÿ. ÀÂÎÊ. 2011. ¹7. Ñ. 30-36

28. Íàóìîâ À.Ï., Êðàïêî Ä.Â. ÑÎ2: êðèòåðèé ýôôåêòèâíîñòè ñèñòåì âåíòèëÿöèè. ÀÂÎÊ. 2015. ¹1. Ñ. 12-17.

29. Balaras C.A., Dascalaki E., Gaglia A., Droutsa K. Energy conservation potential, HVAC installations and operational issues in Hellenic airports. Energy and Buildings. 2003. Vol. 35. Ð. 1105-1120. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.09.006

30. Boyce P.R. Illuminance selection based on visual performance – and other fairy stories. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society. 1996. Vol. 25. C. 41-49. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.1996.10748146

31. Tregenza P.R., Romaya S.M., Dawe S.P., Heap L.J., Tuck B. Consistency and variation in preferences for office lighting. Lighting Research and Technology. 1974. ¹6. P. 205-211. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/096032717400600403

32. Galasiu A.D., Veitch J.A. Occupants preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy and Buildings. 2006. Vol. 38. P. 728-742. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001

33. Light and lighting – Lighting of work places. Part 1: Indoor work places : EN 12464-1:2002 (Å). Brussels, 2002. 43 ð.